THE NEW USCIS PUBLIC CHARGE RULE

Authored by:

Shama Merchant Poonja Headshot

CEO & Managing Attorney

Shama Merchant Poonja

As a first generation American, Ms. Poonja is committed to the field of immigration law. Since 2013, Ms. Poonja has been representing corporate and individual clients on a wide variety of business and family immigration law matters.

Reviewed by:

Sejal Parikh Headshot

Senior Attorney

Sejal Parikh

Ms. Parikh’s experience in business immigration includes representing employers of all sizes in various industry verticals, from Fortune 500 multinational corporations to emerging growth companies, startups, and large consulting companies. She provides expertise across a wide range of employment-based cases, focusing on both nonimmigrant and immigrant petitions.

Share

On December 23, 2022, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) began using the new public charge inadmissibility test that was published in a final rule in September. The new rule will apply to applications postmarked or electronically submitted on or after December 23, 2022. This rule restores the historical meaning of the term ‘public charge,’ which had been in effect for decades prior to the Trump Administration’s restrictive revision of that term in 2019.

The new public charge rule is essentially the same as the 1999 Interim Field Guidance on the public charge ground of inadmissibility and returns the analysis of public charge inadmissibility to that which was in place prior to 2019. In the new rule, a noncitizen is deemed likely to become a public charge if DHS determines that they are likely to become dependent on the government for subsistence based on a “totality of circumstances” analysis of the following factors:

  • The noncitizen’s age; health; family status; assets, resources, and financial status; and education and skills, as required by the INA; The filing of Form I-864, Affidavit of Support under Section 213A of the INA, submitted on a noncitizen’s behalf when one is required; and
  • The noncitizen’s prior or current receipt of Supplemental Security Income (SSI); cash assistance for income maintenance under Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF); State, Tribal, territorial, or local cash benefit programs for income maintenance (often called General Assistance); or long-term institutionalization at government expense.

What Benefits Are Not Considered in the Public Charge Analysis?

In general, if a program typically does not provide the primary source of income, or it is made available without income-based eligibility rules, USCIS will not consider those programs in making a public charge determination. USCIS will not consider the following types of benefits in the public charge analysis:

  • Benefits received by family members other than the applicant Receipt of certain non-cash benefits such as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) or other nutrition assistance programs;
  • Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP); Medicaid (other than for long-term institutionalization); housing benefits; any immunization benefits; disease-testing benefits; or other supplemental or special-purpose benefits
  • Specific purpose payments, such as payments for childcare, energy assistance, disaster relief, pandemic assistance, or for other specific purposes

Who Is a Public Charge?

 Under Immigration & Nationality Act (INA) Sections 212 (a)(4) and 237 (a)(5), a public charge is a noncitizen “who has become or is likely to become primarily dependent on the federal government for subsistence as demonstrated by either: the receipt of public cash assistance for income maintenance; or institutionalization for long-term care at government expense.

Am I Exempt from the Public Charge Analysis?

The new rule provides a list of those who are exempt from the public charge ground of inadmissibility, such as refugees, asylees and other statutorily or regulatorily exempt humanitarian categories, as well as the limited options for requesting a waiver of a public charge determination.

If you have questions about the public charge rule, we encourage you to reach out to our office at ffarequest@fleischut.com

Disclaimer

The information on this website is for general information purposes only and does not constitute solicitation or provision of legal advice. Viewing information on this website and/or contacting Naya Law Group, PC does not establish an attorney-client relationship. This blog should not be used as a substitute for obtaining legal advice for any individual case or situation from an attorney licensed or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction.