Immigration Update: USCIS Issues Additional Guidance on How USCIS Evaluates Evidence For EB-1 Cases

Authored by:

Shama Merchant Poonja Headshot

CEO & Managing Attorney

Shama Merchant Poonja

As a first generation American, Ms. Poonja is committed to the field of immigration law. Since 2013, Ms. Poonja has been representing corporate and individual clients on a wide variety of business and family immigration law matters.

Reviewed by:

Sejal Parikh Headshot

Senior Attorney

Sejal Parikh

Ms. Parikh’s experience in business immigration includes representing employers of all sizes in various industry verticals, from Fortune 500 multinational corporations to emerging growth companies, startups, and large consulting companies. She provides expertise across a wide range of employment-based cases, focusing on both nonimmigrant and immigrant petitions.

Share

Overview:

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued additional guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual to clarify how USCIS evaluates evidence to determine eligibility for extraordinary ability and outstanding professor or researcher first preference employment-based immigrant visa classifications.

Who can do an EB-1 Petition:

Persons with extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics can self-petition for first preference immigrant visa classification (E11) without a job offer or certification from the U.S. Department of Labor. from the U.S. Department of Labor.

OR

A U.S. employer, including a university, institution of higher learning, or private employer, can also petition for a professor or researcher. The person must be internationally recognized as outstanding in a specific academic area and to work in a tenured or tenure-track position or a comparable position to conduct research in a company.

 

What Was Updated?

  • USCIS added guidance on the evaluation of evidence submitted in extraordinary ability and outstanding professor or researcher petitions.
  • They also provided guidance describing examples of evidence that may satisfy the relevant evidentiary criteria or qualify as comparable evidence, as well as considerations for evaluating such evidence, with a focus on science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) fields.
  • They clarified how officers evaluate the totality of the evidence to determine eligibility for extraordinary ability and outstanding professor or researcher petitions and provides examples of other positive factors that USCIS may consider
Disclaimer

The information on this website is for general information purposes only and does not constitute solicitation or provision of legal advice. Viewing information on this website and/or contacting Naya Law Group, PC does not establish an attorney-client relationship. This blog should not be used as a substitute for obtaining legal advice for any individual case or situation from an attorney licensed or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction.